The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

The Last of Us may have broken the cardinal rule of video game

Jennifer Lawrence: “I Didn't Have a Life. I Thought I Should Go

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

9 Reasons Why The Last Of Us II Is Maybe The Game Of The Generation

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Not So Hidden Israeli Politics of 'The Last of Us Part II

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last Of Us Creator Says A Decision Has Already Been Made

The Last of Us Part II Director's Cut: Kojima's Statement

The Last of Us' Video Game Director Will Direct HBO Series

The Last of Us' HBO Show vs Video Game: The Biggest Differences